Act III, Scene 2 of Hamlet includes a lot of redundant parts
and lines that are not that useful in order to understand the play. At the
beginning of the scene, utterly calm Hamlet gives a lot of useless instructions
and advices for the actors. It is understandable that he desires to find out
more about the death of Hamlet Senior, but this part is not a critical moment
in the play. However, it would be better to keep a few interactions between
Hamlet and the actors. Hamlet is extremely kind and respectful with them and it
looks like he belongs with the actors. It
is also an important moment when you talk about the “Pretense &
Performance” theme.
The conversation between Horatio and Hamlet needs to be a
lot shorter as well. Hamlet cannot stop thanking him for being such a good
friend. It is a significant interaction, because Hamlet asks his friend to keep
an eye on his uncle. I would not exactly cut out the whole scene, but I would
make it much shorter. I have the same
problem with the actors on the stage, because they are very repetative. Again,
it is a critical moment in the play, but it should be a lot shorter. I would
cut out a lot of lines and show the audience more of some reactions of Claudius
and Gertrude to what was happening on the stage. In my opinion, it would be more
entertaining and interesting.
Also Hamlet’s comments about Polonius are comparatively unimportant.
No one needs to know about Polonius’s acting experience. After Hamlet realizes
that his uncle, indeed, did kill his father, he starts to jump around, sing and
hysterically laugh. I would cut out this part as well, because it is not that valuable.
You explain why to cut down but keep the interaction between Hamlet and the actors very well. I like that you connect your decision to one of the key themes we have discussed. Why isn't Hamlet's reaction to the sight of Claudius's reaction important? It seems like this response gives the audience a sense of Hamlet's character and current level of self-control.
ReplyDelete